Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 09:59:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F99B12D916D84A8838064564DFCE803A94B39497EB97890555B57948CBB02F94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661287907989020674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F99B12D916D84A8838064564DFCE803A94B39497EB97890555B57948CBB02F94
  • createdAtMillis - 1684922352858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661287907989020674F99B12D916D84A8838064564DFCE803A94B39497EB97890555B57948CBB02F94