Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 09:05:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BF6AE6704D2600EE0C2288E354A0BB3FCE2D881E60850F3C9ECEFC1AD7CAE3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661287907989020674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BF6AE6704D2600EE0C2288E354A0BB3FCE2D881E60850F3C9ECEFC1AD7CAE3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1684919107895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16612879079890206748BF6AE6704D2600EE0C2288E354A0BB3FCE2D881E60850F3C9ECEFC1AD7CAE3D