Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 14:15:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C468C9D7925A25369CF275169B133606CD47A8F3A63EF72F5E9BADD3440F85D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661287907989020674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C468C9D7925A25369CF275169B133606CD47A8F3A63EF72F5E9BADD3440F85D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684937717646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661287907989020674C468C9D7925A25369CF275169B133606CD47A8F3A63EF72F5E9BADD3440F85D1