Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-09 14:35:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661287907989020674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1686321315623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661287907989020674E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF