Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-20 03:05:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

Written by 80726882E2AE2A3F53785C297D76E1FCDF1AA73C85EE77DAD2D23D5856EBA36D
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1659757306110787584
• noteId - 1659757306110787584
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 80726882E2AE2A3F53785C297D76E1FCDF1AA73C85EE77DAD2D23D5856EBA36D Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1684551953234
• tweetId - 1659284100610498561
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.