Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 11:17:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09002D1A3AE1B88BE5568BD541C106C1B06D6BB1F711F928792BC65D044CF5A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659757306110787584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09002D1A3AE1B88BE5568BD541C106C1B06D6BB1F711F928792BC65D044CF5A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1684581432560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 165975730611078758409002D1A3AE1B88BE5568BD541C106C1B06D6BB1F711F928792BC65D044CF5A9