Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 06:24:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A5E9F8ED2333AFB10B518F3E96C4008E57FC67B973D62296CFEE4A8988414B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659757306110787584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A5E9F8ED2333AFB10B518F3E96C4008E57FC67B973D62296CFEE4A8988414B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1684563871680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16597573061107875846A5E9F8ED2333AFB10B518F3E96C4008E57FC67B973D62296CFEE4A8988414B4