Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 08:26:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659757306110787584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1684571216570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659757306110787584ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD