Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 14:19:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659757306110787584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1684592345571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16597573061107875844A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE