Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 09:32:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01748A20C7B66F94C3AD0E6888C6B8BFA33F2FC1A3F485741276A8B3221D35FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

AP is presenting their opinion as fact. The election might have not been stolen, but there's no unquestionable proof of that. Also, they fail to provide any evidence of their claim. They said they paid for an analysis, but don't reveal the details of that analysis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659757306110787584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01748A20C7B66F94C3AD0E6888C6B8BFA33F2FC1A3F485741276A8B3221D35FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1684575150179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 165975730611078758401748A20C7B66F94C3AD0E6888C6B8BFA33F2FC1A3F485741276A8B3221D35FF