Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-02 23:33:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

Written by 4699E91C1D5A8DD4E2C63A6B2D38BBD4D7D0E96CA226E3B6F79DB7663F7DAD3F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1653543199388975105
• noteId - 1653543199388975105
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 4699E91C1D5A8DD4E2C63A6B2D38BBD4D7D0E96CA226E3B6F79DB7663F7DAD3F Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1683070394738
• tweetId - 1653434878438920194
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.