Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 00:16:56 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653543199388975105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418
  • createdAtMillis - 1683073016490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16535431993889751055B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418