Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 23:34:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653543199388975105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683070455431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653543199388975105ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD