Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 23:43:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653543199388975105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1683070998003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16535431993889751052F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE