Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 14:05:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEFD2CACA791BA6666D2548F85F1AC8198D7AB1C085B68A7B603D3301AF70FC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653543199388975105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEFD2CACA791BA6666D2548F85F1AC8198D7AB1C085B68A7B603D3301AF70FC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1683122722804
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653543199388975105CEFD2CACA791BA6666D2548F85F1AC8198D7AB1C085B68A7B603D3301AF70FC6