Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 01:53:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11021B47E2254C295E046E2A6FD4CCCAF94567C6BD22D0F8A8BBB02A959A2C27
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post expresses opinions. As for the technical accuracy of 'constitutional right to abortion', it was previously constitutionally protected, then those rights were taken away when the previous ruling was reversed. The wording in the tweet is accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653543199388975105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11021B47E2254C295E046E2A6FD4CCCAF94567C6BD22D0F8A8BBB02A959A2C27
  • createdAtMillis - 1683078818781
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165354319938897510511021B47E2254C295E046E2A6FD4CCCAF94567C6BD22D0F8A8BBB02A959A2C27