Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2022-07-13 00:05:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace

Written by DB835EE09E208271F1AE42AA00D8490D
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1547009369086337024
• noteId - 1547009369086337024
• participantId - DB835EE09E208271F1AE42AA00D8490D
• noteAuthorParticipantId -
• createdAtMillis - 1657670750291
• tweetId - 1546612809328386055
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace