Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-14 00:14:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EA7F2F7EB85A0F33E9157CB3487AE228B3A3E746267753D0FE81E6F02CD217B
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1547009369086337024
  • participantId - 0EA7F2F7EB85A0F33E9157CB3487AE228B3A3E746267753D0FE81E6F02CD217B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1657757652309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15470093690863370240EA7F2F7EB85A0F33E9157CB3487AE228B3A3E746267753D0FE81E6F02CD217B