Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-14 03:31:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8287473C23000581E5B9AA8BA49800DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1547009369086337024
  • participantId - 8287473C23000581E5B9AA8BA49800DB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1657769460815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15470093690863370248287473C23000581E5B9AA8BA49800DB