Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-13 13:16:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1547009369086337024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437
  • createdAtMillis - 1657718177591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1547009369086337024B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437