Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-13 17:10:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's against the law to attempt to 'influence' judges. Protest does not automatically qualify as attempted influence. It's somewhat questionable whether protest is legal at judges' homes, but there is no blanket ban on any protest in the vicinity of a judge. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/13/politics/picketing-law-supreme-court-homes/index.html https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/626/united-states-v-grace

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1547009369086337024
  • participantId - 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1657732231187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15470093690863370249736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E