Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2021-05-11 06:18:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.

Written by 485F092F78A555835DD87B9BE68094A4
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1392001254327390208
• noteId - 1392001254327390208
• participantId - 485F092F78A555835DD87B9BE68094A4
• noteAuthorParticipantId -
• createdAtMillis - 1620713935820
• tweetId - 1391754136031477760
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
• harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
• validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.