Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-05-12 17:08:49 UTC -

Rated by Participant: E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1392001254327390208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1620839329788
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1392001254327390208E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA