Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-05-11 18:49:19 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C
Participant Details

Original Note:

See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1392001254327390208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C
  • createdAtMillis - 1620758959885
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 1
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 1
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 1
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 13920012543273902088BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C