Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 21:20:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA4A72E558D247BCF23B669BD115AA5B1427C53BA36EE84116DE92E39EA81AD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1392001254327390208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA4A72E558D247BCF23B669BD115AA5B1427C53BA36EE84116DE92E39EA81AD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1684963255175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1392001254327390208FA4A72E558D247BCF23B669BD115AA5B1427C53BA36EE84116DE92E39EA81AD2