Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-05-11 12:37:33 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 31C7D3961AA12C62D18B134A20F8ECCE8DF179764B95BDD15221864140BDB9A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

See the response thread which goes over the actual text of the article in question: https://twitter.com/arsonatdennys/status/1391966250138578956?s=21 Basically, OP interprets the fact that anti-maskers as doing data analysis as proof that they are right, but their analysis is often skewed and missing context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1392001254327390208
  • participantId - 31C7D3961AA12C62D18B134A20F8ECCE8DF179764B95BDD15221864140BDB9A7
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1620736653665
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 139200125432739020831C7D3961AA12C62D18B134A20F8ECCE8DF179764B95BDD15221864140BDB9A7