Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-02 15:15:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)

Written by 79E9A0B3E38B7B80F07F21D4C1B7D14C94475B2E99457AE0AD14C86DF097DE87
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1841497205515202980
• noteId - 1841497205515202980
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 79E9A0B3E38B7B80F07F21D4C1B7D14C94475B2E99457AE0AD14C86DF097DE87 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1727882121815
• tweetId - 1841291195919606165
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)