Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 17:28:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF44387424D214CB3DC2704DDAE2311FDA24ECBBFCA9EC510D3ED26B8D4A785E
Participant Details

Original Note:

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841497205515202980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF44387424D214CB3DC2704DDAE2311FDA24ECBBFCA9EC510D3ED26B8D4A785E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727890130239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1841497205515202980AF44387424D214CB3DC2704DDAE2311FDA24ECBBFCA9EC510D3ED26B8D4A785E