Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 16:56:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2FC2036FBAA5E56436576DD04C9F69B94A58330005536BACD7CF51A0F836605
Participant Details

Original Note:

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841497205515202980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2FC2036FBAA5E56436576DD04C9F69B94A58330005536BACD7CF51A0F836605
  • createdAtMillis - 1727888201712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841497205515202980E2FC2036FBAA5E56436576DD04C9F69B94A58330005536BACD7CF51A0F836605