Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 20:45:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 002CDAAD5846951E544F69B9702E3E8E3C68E12E5724523F5D1FACB9C3D85215
Participant Details

Original Note:

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841497205515202980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 002CDAAD5846951E544F69B9702E3E8E3C68E12E5724523F5D1FACB9C3D85215
  • createdAtMillis - 1727901907609
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1841497205515202980002CDAAD5846951E544F69B9702E3E8E3C68E12E5724523F5D1FACB9C3D85215