Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 18:54:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41DB060C3B8FC1075019738426C9FF4F5684CD72EDA77FADACB416E98A0375CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g (Yes, the account is biased. The footage is unedited however.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841497205515202980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41DB060C3B8FC1075019738426C9FF4F5684CD72EDA77FADACB416E98A0375CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727895277052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184149720551520298041DB060C3B8FC1075019738426C9FF4F5684CD72EDA77FADACB416E98A0375CF