Birdwatch Note
2024-07-01 16:32:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law
Written by D1F02C1C53CB7F629DE4A9FBF06E613FA1689D47F2EF211ED6EE7249837D011D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1807790473076949177
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1807814457122296110
- noteId - 1807814457122296110
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D1F02C1C53CB7F629DE4A9FBF06E613FA1689D47F2EF211ED6EE7249837D011D
- createdAtMillis - 1719851528804
- tweetId - 1807790473076949177
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2024-07-01 16:32:08 UTC (1719851528804) |
2024-07-01 23:32:38 UTC (1719876758757) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC (1720925142742) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-07-01 23:32:38 UTC (1719876758757) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-07-02 07:28:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 23:57:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 22:27:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 16:53:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 16:14:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 16:12:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 14:27:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 14:01:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 13:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 13:21:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:24:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:22:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:20:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:14:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:11:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 12:11:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:59:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:57:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:56:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:49:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:48:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:47:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:46:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:40:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-07-01 11:32:45 -0500 | Rating Details |