Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-01 16:32:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law

Written by D1F02C1C53CB7F629DE4A9FBF06E613FA1689D47F2EF211ED6EE7249837D011D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1807790473076949177

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1807814457122296110
  • noteId - 1807814457122296110
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D1F02C1C53CB7F629DE4A9FBF06E613FA1689D47F2EF211ED6EE7249837D011D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719851528804
  • tweetId - 1807790473076949177
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-07-01 16:32:08 UTC
(1719851528804)
2024-07-01 23:32:38 UTC
(1719876758757)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-07-01 23:32:38 UTC
(1719876758757)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-02 07:28:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 23:57:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 22:27:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:53:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:14:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:12:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 14:27:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 14:01:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 13:39:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 13:21:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:24:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:22:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:20:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:14:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:11:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 12:11:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:59:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:57:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:56:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:49:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:48:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:47:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:46:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:40:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 11:32:45 -0500 Rating Details