Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 17:11:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807814457122296110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1719853883317
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807814457122296110219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9