Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 16:49:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D21E09FBBFD68A65DFA8E662043E113932886226C4EF151AD764907BA2DE6EC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807814457122296110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D21E09FBBFD68A65DFA8E662043E113932886226C4EF151AD764907BA2DE6EC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1719852560742
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807814457122296110D21E09FBBFD68A65DFA8E662043E113932886226C4EF151AD764907BA2DE6EC2