Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 19:27:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D0B440E1E2C23DE2413D29AE9252C63331664D492D9DD1A36EDAC4D0485348B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court held content moderation is "expressive activity," undercutting the basic foundation of Florida's argument. While the Court did remand the cases, it did so “for reasons separate from the First Amendment merits.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/1/24166388/supreme-court-ruling-moody-paxton-texas-florida-social-media-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807814457122296110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D0B440E1E2C23DE2413D29AE9252C63331664D492D9DD1A36EDAC4D0485348B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719862056483
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078144571222961109D0B440E1E2C23DE2413D29AE9252C63331664D492D9DD1A36EDAC4D0485348B