Birdwatch Note
2023-12-23 17:59:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1
Written by 9DAA8CF540DDC5E2AFCE2E32822726520777E9E8048BA903125A128E1C25821D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1738578961544753427
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1738620291704864889
- noteId - 1738620291704864889
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9DAA8CF540DDC5E2AFCE2E32822726520777E9E8048BA903125A128E1C25821D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703354354203
- tweetId - 1738578961544753427
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-23 17:59:14 UTC (1703354354203) |
2023-12-23 21:16:17 UTC (1703366177006) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-24 02:00:17 UTC (1703383217195) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-23 21:16:17 UTC (1703366177006) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-23 13:15:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:14:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:11:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:09:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:07:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:02:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:58:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:48:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:44:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:39:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:29:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:24:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:22:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:18:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:03:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:02:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:59:51 -0600 | Rating Details |