Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-23 18:44:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738620291704864889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1703357072565
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1738620291704864889C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2