Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-23 17:59:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738620291704864889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1703354391827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1738620291704864889E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE