Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-23 19:07:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED6668127B782DD9A78AA86EA2D3DCEA62830A7FDD6EC7038A6F3FD876C43BDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738620291704864889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED6668127B782DD9A78AA86EA2D3DCEA62830A7FDD6EC7038A6F3FD876C43BDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1703358434946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1738620291704864889ED6668127B782DD9A78AA86EA2D3DCEA62830A7FDD6EC7038A6F3FD876C43BDA