Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-23 19:02:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “hate speech” limitation to the First Amendment. Rather, one could argue that speech deemed critical of government or ‘controversial’ are one of the core protections provided by the First Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738620291704864889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB
  • createdAtMillis - 1703358121860
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17386202917048648895E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB