Birdwatch Note
2023-11-02 23:53:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d
Written by 032B279F0160B5924B58CC2689594C9A9BC06946D098A7A2F179421C8305153D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719892133673574825
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720227678408921533
- noteId - 1720227678408921533
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 032B279F0160B5924B58CC2689594C9A9BC06946D098A7A2F179421C8305153D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698969213473
- tweetId - 1719892133673574825
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-02 23:53:33 UTC (1698969213473) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC (1699067056450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-03 17:17:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 13:34:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 12:22:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 08:14:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 05:57:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 05:44:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 04:09:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 03:30:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 02:59:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 00:37:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 00:34:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 00:07:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 23:56:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 23:12:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 22:58:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 21:49:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 21:43:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 21:03:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 21:01:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 20:43:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 20:24:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 20:05:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 19:33:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 19:30:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 19:05:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 01:43:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 23:20:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 23:11:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 23:08:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 22:29:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 22:14:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-20 12:45:53 -0600 | Rating Details |