Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 10:44:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE11E8702F0884F333245B7BBCD151FF4E6BC7837E2222AD7C6B4B393FBF383B
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720227678408921533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE11E8702F0884F333245B7BBCD151FF4E6BC7837E2222AD7C6B4B393FBF383B
  • createdAtMillis - 1699008248403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720227678408921533BE11E8702F0884F333245B7BBCD151FF4E6BC7837E2222AD7C6B4B393FBF383B