Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 05:07:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7412FA94C85A81AFF2F5E5D826FD72E7B870AD655F6AB91FFCDA8C8BC9BC4D65
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720227678408921533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7412FA94C85A81AFF2F5E5D826FD72E7B870AD655F6AB91FFCDA8C8BC9BC4D65
  • createdAtMillis - 1698988034965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17202276784089215337412FA94C85A81AFF2F5E5D826FD72E7B870AD655F6AB91FFCDA8C8BC9BC4D65