Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 13:14:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720227678408921533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E
  • createdAtMillis - 1699017262318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17202276784089215336BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E