Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 01:24:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 319C2A0C43CF39D1FA7D107ECD78A0848F0A6C0BD0E3EA48AE473351843346C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that any of the ballots were "illegal" (fraudulent), only that the person delivering the ballots violated the procedural rules for return of an absentee ballot by someone other than the voter. https://apnews.com/article/mishandled-ballots-bridgeport-connecticut-election-security-70f95f347dfa1e581a6955027d64ae2d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720227678408921533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 319C2A0C43CF39D1FA7D107ECD78A0848F0A6C0BD0E3EA48AE473351843346C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1698974681855
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1720227678408921533319C2A0C43CF39D1FA7D107ECD78A0848F0A6C0BD0E3EA48AE473351843346C3