Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-25 19:09:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000

Written by 4334C221CDED0AAC622BFDC6022B87FA0614A6892D4768BEDD5E3F620ECA6DC4
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1695151313359679592
• noteId - 1695151313359679592
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 4334C221CDED0AAC622BFDC6022B87FA0614A6892D4768BEDD5E3F620ECA6DC4 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1692990542152
• tweetId - 1695007005537112446
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000