Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 13:57:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B872E9E9827599E960E0A04E9A36559F4502994FA4F9CAF5B3E68E5279F5458E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695151313359679592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B872E9E9827599E960E0A04E9A36559F4502994FA4F9CAF5B3E68E5279F5458E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693058271020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695151313359679592B872E9E9827599E960E0A04E9A36559F4502994FA4F9CAF5B3E68E5279F5458E