Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 10:13:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 565201733019A3C26B8668FD43C4280A051C870F549411F075B2C71E9A7A3175
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695151313359679592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 565201733019A3C26B8668FD43C4280A051C870F549411F075B2C71E9A7A3175
  • createdAtMillis - 1693044808387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695151313359679592565201733019A3C26B8668FD43C4280A051C870F549411F075B2C71E9A7A3175