Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 09:19:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695151313359679592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1693041554068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169515131335967959249BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2