Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 04:02:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8351F2F6ADB655F78A4D3559F2CBA923232F8228F43308E5E807EB83A2B67E5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court of appeal denied Mr Fox to rule that the tweets that called Mr Fox Racist where infact "obvious" opinion and not libel. The judge dismissed all counter claims from Mr Fox arguing he was libeled under the term racism. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695151313359679592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8351F2F6ADB655F78A4D3559F2CBA923232F8228F43308E5E807EB83A2B67E5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693022574045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16951513133596795928351F2F6ADB655F78A4D3559F2CBA923232F8228F43308E5E807EB83A2B67E5E